An discussion on the existence of god

Existence of God

Reason and probability are on the side of creation, not chance or mere force Rom. Instead, it says I cannot know. The term "ignosticism" was coined in the s by Sherwin Winea rabbi and a founding figure of Humanistic Judaism. Is there anything you would like Him to say to you? Unlike other teachers who focused people on their words, Jesus pointed people to himself.

The Earth is located the right distance from the sun. And this viewpoint, whether picked up through formal instruction or simply by the process of osmosis from their culture, is not without serious repercussions on the way people think and act.

Communication allow about 5 minutes for this section Discussion Prompt 1: This is the system of pursuing knowledge through observation and experiment. Europeans polled who "believe in a god", according to Eurobarometer in North Americans polled about religious identity Positions on the existence of God can be divided along numerous axes, producing a variety of orthogonal classifications.

Ibn Rushd a 12th-century Islamic scholar Many Islamic scholars have used philosophical and rational arguments to prove the existence of God. Your goal is to surface the spiritual condition of various people in the group. Why in Acts Lewis said he remembered, " This is your decision, no coercion here.

It does not refer to a mere ignorance of God, but applies to one who considers himself informed on the claims and evidence for the existence of God and who emphatically denies them.

When a man walking through the woods finds the tracks of a deer that has passed there only hours before, he knows that a deer was there because of the evidence of the tracks even though he does not see the deer.

Is There a God?

Each lesson ends with a list of helpful review questions ideal for group Bible study. The problem is not one of evidence, but of rebellion and negative volition to God Ps.

Atheism The atheistic conclusion is that the arguments and evidence both indicate there is insufficient reason to believe that any gods exist, and that personal subjective religious experiences say something about the human experience rather than the nature of reality itself; therefore, one has no reason to believe that a god exists.

You will probably find that few of your group members will openly admit that they are close-minded on the issue.

The Existence of God

If I could conclusively prove to believers that they were wrong, then the issue is off the table, and I would be free to go about my life. Why I hold this position: All group members should find a way to openly discuss the topic at hand in an atmosphere of kindness and respect.

Atheism The atheistic conclusion is that the arguments and evidence both indicate there is insufficient reason to believe that any gods exist, and that personal subjective religious experiences say something about the human experience rather than the nature of reality itself; therefore, one has no reason to believe that a god exists.

Few of us have ever seen our brains, yet we believe that we possess them because of a centralized control system in the body. Is he loving or cruel? Malcolm Muggeridge, socialist and philosophical author, wrote, "I had a notion that somehow, besides questing, I was being pursued.

Existence of God

The human brain processes more than a million messages a second. Life must have a beginning. The notion that God never intervenes or communicates with the universe, or may have evolved into the universe, makes it difficult, if not by definition impossible, to distinguish between a universe with God and one without.

This school was instituted by Cornelius Van Tiland came to be popularly called presuppositional apologetics though Van Til himself felt "transcendental" would be a more accurate title. The non-overlapping magisteria view proposed by Stephen Jay Gould also holds that the existence or otherwise of God is irrelevant to and beyond the domain of science.

Debate about how theism should be argued[ edit ] In Christian faith, theologians and philosophers make a distinction between:Objection #1: As the saying goes, beauty lies in the eye of the beholder.

This is also true with other simple things such as goodness. Goodness lies in the eye of the beholder. Actions are mere actions yet humans may decide what to think about them. Objection #2: "In the beginning God. The holidays are rolling around, and for many, this means a heightened religious life.

In light of this, I would like to start a general discussion about the existence of god. I will start. I think I would consider myself an agnostic with regards to the existence of an omnipotent, omniscient. The best argument for the existence of God will be a “big-picture” kind of argument.

God Doesn’t Believe in Atheists The Bible teaches that atheists are not really atheists. The Bible teaches that atheists are not really atheists. That is, those who profess to be atheists do ultimately believe in God.

Jun 03,  · A god proofing the Universe into existence seems like magic to me. I believe everything works according to the natural laws.

The fact that the various books in the bible have one primary theme is because the compilers of the bible planned it.

Philosophical Discussion: The Existence of God

The discussion over the existence of God remains one of the finest pursuits of the human mind to break out of the world and surpass the practical or extraordinary realm of experience. Without a doubt, the question of God's existence is one of the most significant questions of human philosophy.

If God were omnipotent, omniscient, and omnibenevolent, then evil would not exist. The concept of the God of Classical Theism is incoherent because within the attributes of God contradict each other and they also contradict our experience of the universe.

Download
An discussion on the existence of god
Rated 5/5 based on 30 review